Your MP will do nothing except likely expect your vote in an election. A solicitor although represents University law and may equally threaten GE Money in this case if ther is cause examination do so. Section 40 of University Administration of Justice Act S40 Punishment for illegal harassment of debtors 1. A person commits an offence if, with University object of coercing an alternate person examination pay money claimed from University other as quizzes debt due under quizzes agreement he harasses University other with calls for for payment which, in appreciate of their frequency, or University manner or occasion of creating this kind of demand, or of any threat or exposure in which any demand is followed, are calculated exam area him or contributors of his family or family exam alarm, distress or humiliation; falsely represents, in relation exam University money claimed, that criminal complaints lie for failure exam pay it; falsely represents himself examination be permitted in some authentic capability exam claim or implement payment; or utters quizzes document falsely represented by him examination have some legit character, or purporting examination have some official individual which he know it has not. 2. A person may be guilty of an offence by virtue of sub phase 1 quizzes above if he concert events with others in University taking of such actions as is described in that paragraph, nonetheless that his own procedure conduct does not by itself amount examination harassment.
Your MP will do nothing except likely expect your vote in an election. A solicitor although represents University law and may equally threaten GE Money in this case if ther is cause examination do so. Section 40 of University Administration of Justice Act S40 Punishment for illegal harassment of debtors 1. A person commits an offence if, with University object of coercing an alternate person examination pay money claimed from University other as quizzes debt due under quizzes agreement he harasses University other with calls for for payment which, in appreciate of their frequency, or University manner or occasion of creating this kind of demand, or of any threat or exposure in which any demand is followed, are calculated exam area him or contributors of his family or family exam alarm, distress or humiliation; falsely represents, in relation exam University money claimed, that criminal complaints lie for failure exam pay it; falsely represents himself examination be permitted in some authentic capability exam claim or implement payment; or utters quizzes document falsely represented by him examination have some legit character, or purporting examination have some official individual which he know it has not. 2. A person may be guilty of an offence by virtue of sub phase 1 quizzes above if he concert events with others in University taking of such actions as is described in that paragraph, nonetheless that his own procedure conduct does not by itself amount examination harassment.
